|
|
FEATURE
Sweet Music
BY SARAH LORGE BUTLER ’95
John Corigliano ’59 is widely acknowledged as one
of the finest composers of his generation, and he
has a Pulitzer and an Oscar to support that opinion.
But he takes an unconventional view of where great
art is coming from these days — and it’s not from
where you’d expect. Corigliano says it’s not from
the world of music and its great venues, such as
Lincoln Center, Carnegie Hall or the Metropolitan
Opera. Nor is it from the visual arts, the stage
or the written page.
|
|
Corigliano
believes in making his music clear and understandable
for the audience.
PHOTO: EILEEN BARROSO |
|
It’s coming, Corigliano maintains, from television.
“I find the best art coming out of HBO,”
he says. “I was watching Oz the other
day. It’s terrifying. It’s violent and
wild and hallucinatory and brilliant, because HBO
has to reach people. No matter what it’s doing,
whether it’s comic or horror, it knows it
must reach an audience.”
In a composing career that has spanned five decades,
Corigliano has made reaching an audience his first
priority. It’s not easy to do in classical
music, as the composer must take the audience on
a journey without the benefit of words or pictures.
Corigliano is acutely aware of the challenge. “I’m
one of those composers who believes that even the
simplest piece in the world is hard for people to
understand,” he says. “You can’t
be too clear.”
Nor is it easy to affect listeners when the musical
establishment downplays the importance of connecting
with the masses. Corigliano contends that his peers
in classical composing are more interested in writing
for each other, the musical elite, than for the
folks who fill concert halls. A fellow composer
once told Corigliano that he considers a concert
to be a private communication through public means.
“When he writes, he’s addressing his
music to a few colleagues who are sitting in a 3,000-seat
auditorium, like, maybe, 10 of them,” Corigliano
says, the outrage rising in his voice. “He
doesn’t care about the public. That kind of
arrogance has led to a mess.”
Corigliano has spun a highly successful career
by putting a premium on the listener and sounding
a dissonant note against the composers in the ivory
tower. In 2001, he won a Pulitzer Prize for his
Symphony No. 2; in 2000, he won an Oscar
for his film score for The Red Violin.
His Symphony No. 1 is one of the world’s
most played contemporary works, having been performed
by more than 125 orchestras. Corigliano also has
published dozens of scores, from concertos to dances
to an opera, The Ghosts of Versailles,
which when it was staged in 1991 was the Metropolitan
Opera’s first new opera in 25 years. In March,
the College honored Corigliano with a 2003 John
Jay Award for Distinguished Professional Achievement.
|
|
Corigliano
with President Lee C. Bollinger and Dean Austin
Quigley at the 2003 John Jay Awards Dinner. |
|
“John’s a composer who wants it to
feel good for the player and wants it to work for
the audience,” says renowned violinist Joshua
Bell, who played the music to The Red Violin.
“Some composers are so isolated, they don’t
care about what anybody thinks, and they’re
writing for this abstract reason. John will come
out and say that music is for performance, he wants
the audience to be satisfied — and he does
that without pandering. I like John’s view.”
It may say “composer” on Corigliano’s
1040, but he believes that to be successful in the
profession, you need to be an architect first, with
a design and a plan for every piece. Whether he’s
working in his country home in Carmel, N.Y., or
his apartment on the Upper West Side, before he
gets to the smaller questions — filling in
movements and inventing themes — he answers
the big ones that influence a composition’s
structure: Who is this piece for? What am I trying
to do with it? How long is it going to be?
So emphatic is Corigliano about the correct order
of events in composition — structure first,
details later — that he has multiple metaphors
at the ready to describe the process. “Can
you imagine writing an Agatha Christie novel, writing
the entire book and getting to the last 50 pages
and not knowing who the murderer was?” he
asks. “If you’re decorating an apartment,
you don’t start with a lamp or an ashtray.
If you’re designing a building, you don’t
start with the cornice.”
That philosophy is all part of making his pieces
understandable for the audience. It does not mean
that Corigliano’s pieces lack complexity;
in fact, they’re known for their intricacies
and their difficulty and range of style. But his
compositions take the listener on a journey, which
ultimately makes music more satisfying for the audience
and explains his appeal. “I’ve heard
plenty of pieces in which any moment of it is pretty
or interesting,” Corigliano says. “But
after 10 or 15 minutes, I am bored, because it doesn’t
add up to anything.
“When you talk about what you do, you do
each piece differently, based on the architecture
that you build. But you build something, and then
you find the music. It can be very adventurous,
very wild, but it has purpose.”
|
|
Corigliano
with conductor Seiji Ozawa of the Boston Symphony
Orchestra.
PHOTO: EILEEN BARROSO |
|
It’s a system that Corigliano impresses upon
his composing students at Lehman College, where
he holds the title Distinguished Professor of Music,
and Juilliard, where he has been on the music division
faculty since 1991, teaching composition one-on-one
to students. “It’s nice to talk to somebody
who says, ‘Chill out, don’t start writing
a theme for a piece you don’t understand yet,’”
says Mason Bates ’00, a composer who studied
with Corigliano at Juilliard. “He would say,
‘Tell me in words what this piece is about.
What does it mean to you, and what do you want to
communicate?’ It means a lot to a composer
to think about that. John told me, ‘You have
a good ear, you have good ideas, but you need to
think about this entire piece before you start banging
away.’ With John, it’s about imagining
a whole space before you begin.”
For Corigliano, that usually means envisioning
an entirely new structure. Using pre-existing symphonic
forms is like “Levittown,” he says —
an easy way to fit your ideas into “prefabricated
housing.” His refusal to take the easy route
is a reflection of the exacting standards to which
he holds himself, as well as his capacity for originality
and inventiveness. “He’s hard on himself,”
says Norman Ryan, Corigliano’s manager at
music publisher G. Schirmer. “For years, he
shied away from writing a symphony because he thought,
‘What new do I have to add to that form?’
It wasn’t until he was about 55 that he wrote
his first symphony. He only felt he could do it
if he had something important to contribute.”
Corigliano grew up in Brooklyn. His mother was
a pianist who never played in public, his father,
a violinist in what is one of the music world’s
most visible and pressure-packed roles: concertmaster
of the New York Philharmonic. Watching his father
sweat out
the practice for each performance, then reading
what the
critics thought of him the next day in the seven
daily newspapers published in New York at the time,
could have been enough to squash any son’s
desire to perform.
But it didn’t diminish Corigliano’s
enthusiasm for music. He grew up with the 108 members
of the New York Philharmonic as his extended family,
and later wrote his 1977 clarinet concerto as an
elegy for his father and a tribute to the players
in the orchestra. Corigliano was drawn to composing,
in part, he says, “because my parents didn’t
want me to get into music, and especially composing.”
As a young man, Corigliano says he was tense and
hyper-energetic. Columbia was a logical, almost
inevitable choice for him — a top university
with a strong music program in New York City. Even
as a college student, he found himself resisting
the prevailing view of composing as a scholarly
exercise to be understood only by a select few.
That he’s still working in the minority,
40 years later, gives Corigliano a rather pessimistic
view of the state of classical music. “One
of the problems with concert music is this lack-of-future
feeling,” he says, the idea that it is “an
art form that’s dying in front of our eyes.
And I think a lot of it is because classical music
has ceased to have an active contemporary life.
Presenters of classical music have relied on those
old pieces to be the only diet.”
The reasons, he says, are plentiful. When composers
don’t try to engage their audience, the audience
has trouble understanding and enjoying the compositions.
But most audiences are afraid to object. “They
think, ‘Well, I don’t know anything,’”
Corigliano says. “And the critic usually says,
‘It’s wonderful,’ and the public
feels foolish. They leave classical music and find
musical art in pop, folk, rock, rap — something
that relates to them.”
The economics of the profession don’t help
matters, either. Orchestras have less and less rehearsal
time. Musicians should see the music well in advance
of a performance, but they often don’t —
the standard is for an orchestra to start rehearsing
a piece on Tuesday for a Thursday performance, Corigliano
says. It may have three or four rehearsals, but
that rehearsal time is divided among all the pieces
on the program. Corigliano attends rehearsals, but
his music is difficult, and he often feels it’s
only by the second or third performance that the
players really start to get it. By then, it’s
too late — they’ve already begun rehearsing
for the next program.
For someone as detail-oriented as Corigliano, going
to the concert hall to hear his music played can
make for an excruciating evening — something
he has only been able to stomach in the past 10
years. “I used to stay out of the hall itself
so I could pace,” he says. “You have
no control when you’re hearing your piece,
and it’s very nerve-wracking, especially if
it’s difficult music.” The critics,
he says, are usually even less prepared than the
musicians, because they don’t read the score.
“I’ve had cases where an orchestra has
gotten completely lost and made up half the piece,
and The New York Times has written a review
and liked it. I wondered what they would have thought
if they’d heard my piece.”
Such abundant cause for frustration has motivated
Corigliano to do whatever he can to champion his
music. He gives frequent pre-concert lectures and
finds audiences starving for the insights a composer
can share. He is devoted to his students and impresses
upon them the importance of representing the profession
and living the life of a composer.
“When I was first studying with him, he
seemed to think I was something akin to Woody Allen,
kind of neurotic,” Bates recalls. “He
said, ‘You might think it’s kind of
cutesy for a composer to be a person who can’t
speak and then when his music is played, that’s
when he speaks to the world. But in reality, you
need to put the most professional face on your music
that you can.’” The job, Bates says,
doesn’t end when you put the double bar line
on a piece; you need to be an advocate for your
music on every level.
|
|
Corigliano
and Columbia students at an event in Lerner
Hall last year.
PHOTO: LAURA BUTCHY |
|
For Corigliano, every time there is an audience,
there is a chance to educate on contemporary composing.
The Academy Awards — with a television audience
of millions — proved no exception.
Often the most popular movie of a given year takes
home the Oscar for best original score. In 2000,
the big winner was American Beauty. But
it did not win for best score; that honor went to
The Red Violin. When presenters Charlize
Theron and Keanu Reeves announced Corigliano’s
name, the camera captured a look of amazement on
his face. He stood up from his sixth-row seat, let
the air escape from his lungs, and paused in the
aisle momentarily, fist at his heart. On stage,
he cradled the statuette in the crook of his arm,
but he seized the opportunity to offer a nugget
about composing: “I didn’t think I was
going to be up here, and I’m really speechless,”
he said. “But I just want to tell you, thanks
so much. You know, I’m from another world,
of classical music, and when I write my symphonies
and my concertos, it’s a very lonely profession.
One thing I’ve learned about film writing
is how communal it is. And the reason people give
thanks is because there are so many people who had
so much to do with this film and with the music.”
He thanked the director, the producer and Bell,
the violinist, who uses Corigliano’s words
from that evening on his promotional materials.
It was, according to Bates and Ryan, a classic Corigliano
moment — a chance to entertain, educate and
connect with an audience.
For more about Columbia and the Arts, please
see the Fall 2003 issue of Columbia magazine.
Sarah Lorge Butler ’95
is an editorial projects writer at Sports Illustrated.
|
|
Untitled Document
|